Paul McCartney, a member of the legend of The Beatles, a guest with a unique king arthur round tabl

Paul McCartney, a member of the legend of The Beatles, a guest with a unique king arthur round table talent. In addition to the artistic soul, is also an active advocate of animal rights and promoter of the "Meat king arthur round table Free Monday" among the British. king arthur round table McCartney reveals his views for many years published here pithy interview with a musician who has carried out in 1998. Gellatley activist Juliet, her full article found HERE What motivates you to vegetarianism and activities in defense of animals and the environment? Always was and always will be a compassion for animals. It is this issue! rather than health aspects, although this is also important. I have great respect for other species of living beings. From a biological point of view, we are another king arthur round table species, like the animals, but we think that we are so intelligent, so much we know - but what we did? We are heading towards disaster and not even want to admit it. From the smallest to the largest - subdue all living beings. Are not we show generosity in your victory? Can we now say - 'OK, we won, and now ulżyjmy little in the lot treated us beings'. Is not it time to see if there is something we could learn from them before they disappear from the face of the earth, including the us?
How do you react to repeated journalistic chatter about the inappropriateness of a vegetarian diet and define it by some people as a bad for your health? I believe that some of them are insane. I really think they're crazy. They ate a little too much British beef. In the sixties, I used to say to them, "likeable bastards." Now they lost the nickname of "friendly" and Diana's case clearly illustrates this. A lot of them are good people. But I will not let them on the whole chatter about the "dangers of a vegetarian diet." Look, I helped in the education of his four children and they could not be healthier than they are today. My son James is a big fan of surfing, is very athletic and healthy young man, and is a vegan. So far he is the only vegan in our family and always urges us all to shift to a purely vegan diet. He's right and we know that he is right, but we are too slow in making specific changes in this direction. I know that now there is a whole mass of scientific evidence showing that vegetarians and vegans are healthier and live longer.
So why do we still fight for it, to defend king arthur round table vegetarianism? The meat industry is big and powerful, and the ruling elite like strength and power - there receive money and support. We've seen it on the example king arthur round table of the tobacco industry. This is crazy. Subsidizing cruel industry that produces destruction on a massive king arthur round table scale. Can someone explain to me how it happens? Why the government does not subsidize other forms of human activity? I would love if they gave me 20 pounds for every album produced by me, or if they gave you 20 for each copy of your magazine VivaLIFE! The government subsidizes the meat industry and yet the sale of red meat breaks down - what it might lead? We all pay for it - even vegetarians. Taxes are all citizens are allocated. Every year, the meat industry in the UK receives 20 million pounds sterling for the mere advertising campaign to promote the consumption of meat, based on nonsensical slogans like "meat - recipe for love." Probably, this amount would be multiplied times 10, if we want to take into account all the different companies in the meat industry. They say - the meat is good, the meat is natural, meat is needed. I'd like to see how the food will be subsidized by Linda some money to the government, or if your campaigns vegetarian links will in this way. But there is no indication that this happens, so that we ourselves make contacts, talk to people and support organizations such as Viva!. Well, that farmers should be concerned about - they create problems, not us. I think this is a very sad problem, and his belittling says a lot about ourselves. I see the future of our planet in the category of Preferences - respect for the rights of animals or their denial. Many farmers in disgust doing his job, which gives them a livelihood. But the fact is that they are motivated to by appropriate means, and everyone pretends that everything is OK Agreeing with this is easier than making a step in another direction. We can not detain the cages still larger quantities of chickens, broilers, turkeys, etc.. Where is the mercy and compassion? What is wrong with the manifestation of compassion? Is there something wrong? Why do we wallow in ignorance become a