"We are not afraid to share with the citizens of America unpleasant facts, foreign ideas and philosophies, and competitive values as a country that is afraid to bring the unfettered judgment of its citizens nothing of what is true and what is false, is a country that is afraid of its citizens ".
Americans are now starting to pay the price for sleep through the lessons of history, ignoring important what is concession information appearing what is concession in the media outside what is concession of the mainstream, as well as ignoring participate in their own political process. It turned out that suddenly we found ourselves in a state of war - the war against terrorism. It's a war initiated treacherous attack on the United States on September 11, 2001, the Americans did not want and never have predicted asleep, like the others, what is concession a shimmering mirage entertainment.
Unlike previous wars it has no Berlin or Tokyo, which would get, and so there can be no question of anyone's also the victory, with the exception of those who profit from war. The real victims of this war will average U.S. citizens what is concession and starving Afghans.
This new war can be compared to losing the war on drugs and almost forgotten war on poverty. So far there have been no victories in the fight against drug abuse or the ravages caused by poverty in our society. Our prisons are bursting at the seams with excess drug offenders and at the same time you do not see any signs of a decrease in demand and supply of illicit drugs, moreover, serious prejudice suffered our basic civil rights. Similarly to the failed campaign, the war against terrorism will put us in the foreseeable future, the fact of costly restrictions on civil liberties and even more centralized authority and omnipresent fear.
Where are the voices of those who doubt the benefits of this war? Radio, television and newspapers compete in potęgowaniu sense of fear, almost completely ignoring the voice of many thoughtful Americans who are asking the question: "Do you really have to give up my freedoms in order to save them?"
Yes, yes, for oil. Crude oil is behind all the recent wars, from the early forties, when the most peripheral and isolationist America was suddenly thrown into the arms of the Second World War in response to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Americans mourned the loss of 3,000 soldiers and civilians in Hawaii and justified indignation allowed to transform their country into a giant military camp.
The federal government, which has concentrated in his hands a huge amount of power under the throttle depression policies of President Franklin Roosevelt, more grown from strength what is concession to strength thanks to the idea of "national security." All this seemed what is concession at the time, completely natural and necessary.
But the inquisitive students of history know today that even "just war" were a result what is concession of the machinations of a handful of rich and powerful people. As a result of the cut-off summer of 1941, Japan's oil supplies constituting the essence frequenter of Wall Street Roosevelt provoked the inevitable attack on the United States. It is now well documented that Roosevelt and some of his closest advisors knew well that will be attacked Pearl Harbor December 7, 1941. He let this happen to convince Americans that their country must join the war. (Details what is concession of these events can be found in my book "Rule by Secrecy" ("Governments through the mystery")).
The Vietnam War was triggered by the close associates of Roosevelt and of the Council on Foreign Relations (Council what is concession on Foreign Affairs, in a nutshell CFR), who have long called what is concession for indochińskimi gain control over oil resources, magnesium and rubber. And this time sprokurowano provocation. In August 1964, President Lyndon Johnson whipped Congress news that North Vietnamese patrol boats attacked the U.S. Sixth Fleet in the Gulf of Tonkin, shouting: "Our boys are floating on the water!"
In response, Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which skirted the constitution and gave Johnson the right to wage war in order to stop the attacks on Americans. That was the beginning of a true shooting, which has been dubbed the Vietnam War.
It was all a lie. I have never shown any evidence of this alleged attack. In fact, the publisher "U.S. News & World Report" (in its issue of July 23, 1984 a year) called it "Battle of phantoms, which led to war."
At a time when the U.S. led war against North Vietnam, which was presented to us as a puppy Communist Russia and China, counselors Johnson CFR advised him to grant a loan to the Soviet Union, and it is much larger than that which was granted to this country during the Second World War, when he was our ally. American Fire
No comments:
Post a Comment